Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 928 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 197 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $83.24 vs $1075.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.42 vs $5.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |