Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 174 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $89.99 vs $773.52
- Up to 88% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.52 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $773.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |