Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 507 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 273 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $125.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.46 vs $3.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.94/FPS
11%
Price, $
$1075
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
270
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |