Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $244.99 vs $344.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-13700KF - $2.92 vs $3.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 98 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
84
85%
Value, $/FPS
$2.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Buy for $344 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |