Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 873 vs 751 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $162.29 vs $788.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.19 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
18%
Price, $
$788.88
20%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
873
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$162.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $162.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |