Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 1714 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $221.76 vs $339.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - $1.3 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 191 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |