Buy on Amazon
$250
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $250.0 vs $1499.99
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 217 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
215
99.07834101382488%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76611 minutes ago
Intel BX80673I99960X Core i9-9960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC7)
Buy for $1,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76610 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
85.19593613933236%
Multi-Core
6976
69.8018811286772%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
