Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $250.0 vs $998.95
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 12% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 118 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 28 vs 24 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
88.98305084745762%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
100%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76811 minutes ago
Buy for $998.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
80.46607265250172%
Multi-Core
6976
64.98975218930502%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |