Buy on Amazon
$250
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2096 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-3930K - 173 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $250.0 vs $269.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77132 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73930K
Buy for $269.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
606
51.618398637137986%
Multi-Core
2961
42.44552752293578%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
