Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $43.88 vs $235.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.52 vs $2.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
18.571428571428573%
Price, $
$235
18%
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
98.04088586030664%
Multi-Core
3254
46.64564220183486%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |