Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2363 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2100 - 234 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $49.0 vs $235.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
39.69335604770017%
Multi-Core
954
13.675458715596331%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |