Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1824 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium G645T - 123 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
30.39383561643836%
Multi-Core
606
10.459095616154643%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Pentium |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
