Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $109.99 vs $208.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700KF - $0.67 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 172 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
164
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3209 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
54%
Price, $
$208.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |