Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2188 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G540 - 164 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |