Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 62% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-8400 - 579 vs 357 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $80.0 vs $689.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.22 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
18%
Price, $
$689.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $689.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |