Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4150 - 166 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $29.71 vs $749.99
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.2 vs $4.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for $29.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 54 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |