Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2310 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6900K - 214 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $125.0 vs $519.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.73 vs $2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
30%
Price, $
$519.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $519.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |