Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 31% better in Minecraft than Core i3-7100T - 885 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i3-7100T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $65.65 vs $495.17
- Up to 82% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.10 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
885
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
18%
Price, $
$495.17
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
675
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 35 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |