Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 136 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $235.0 vs $466.99
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $466.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
75.73529411764706%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$235
100%
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
39.959155888359426%
Multi-Core
6976
36.15819209039548%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raphael | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 180 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |