Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 488% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3930 - 400 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $88.0 vs $579.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $1.29 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
88.96551724137932%
Price, $
$579.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1825 minutes ago
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
21.54500354358611%
Multi-Core
1043
5.967160592711253%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |