Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-9590 - 229 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-9590 - $1.48 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 120 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $298.02 vs $339.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 220 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |