Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 33% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6100 - 220 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $29.65 vs $390.98
- Up to 90% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.18 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $390.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |