Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4388 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2500 - 218 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $194.3 vs $369.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900 - $1.14 vs $1.69 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
170
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$194.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $194.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |