Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1599 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $299.99 vs $352.36
- Up to 21% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.3 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |