Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-1620 - 176 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$262.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $262.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |