Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2894 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 28% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G1610T - 231 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
