Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 456 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7742 - 121 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 105 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 128 vs 24 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$261.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $261.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | AMD EPYC 7742 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | EPYC |
Vermeer | Codename | Rome |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 64 |
24 | Threads | 128 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 225 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |