Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 1033 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 226 vs 217 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1450
63.652326602282706%
Multi-Core
6387
82.50871980364293%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
