Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 122 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 24 vs 16 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66727 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1450
83.8635049161365%
Multi-Core
6387
63.67896311066799%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Renoir | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |