Buy on Amazon
$295
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 252 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Pentium Gold G6405 - 544 vs 516 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $89.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.16 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 58 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
544
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
29.629629629629626%
Price, $
$295
30%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
516
94.85294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
848
49.045691150954305%
Multi-Core
1760
17.547357926221334%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 39.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
