Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - 276 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $225.99 vs $399.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.83 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10976 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |