Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 676 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 210 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $379.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.8 vs $5.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 32 vs 24 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |