Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 985 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 138 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $370.0 vs $1595.95
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $2.68 vs $12.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 44 vs 24 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$370
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $370 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
133
96.37681159420289%
Value, $/FPS
$12/FPS
22.333333333333336%
Price, $
$1595.95
23%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
69.40342587123449%
Multi-Core
9619
96.79009861139062%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 22 |
24 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |