Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 3620 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 27% better in Dota 2 than Xeon W3690 - 218 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3690 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon W3690 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon |
| Cezanne | Codename | Gulftown |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
