Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 3955 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5645 - 113 vs 88 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5645 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon |
Cezanne | Codename | Westmere-EP |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 80 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |