Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8120 - 187 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $78.02 vs $230.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $0.5 vs $1.23 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |