Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700U is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 181 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700U - 20 vs 16 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 5700U
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
62.74787535410765%
Multi-Core
5378
98.24625502374863%
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Lucienne | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
