Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 341 days older than Ryzen 7 4800HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 1% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 7 4800HS - 131 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS - 56 vs 16 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 4800HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 28 |
| 16 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 255 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
