Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 3800XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 68 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 3800XT.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $260.0 vs $398.45
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $1.33 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 20 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $398.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |