Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 211 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $197.65 vs $397.45
- Up to 44% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $1.05 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 24 vs 16 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
55%
Price, $
$397.45
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $397.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |