Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 146 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$205
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |