Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2226 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 181 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$205
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD P4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |