Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1954 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4460T - 192 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $47.35 vs $129.98
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.27 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $129.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
175
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |