Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G1820 - 174 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $46.41 vs $205.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.28 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |