Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4300 - 590 vs 443 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $48.02 vs $210.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.11 vs $0.36 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |