Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2883 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Xeon X5690 - 172 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | Intel Xeon X5690 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon |
Picasso | Codename | Westmere-EP |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |