Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 541 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 89% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $180.0 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 232 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 44 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77138 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
94.80851063829788%
Multi-Core
5489
57.06414388190041%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |