Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 688 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Ryzen 7 2700 - 187 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $103.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.55 vs $1.02 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |