Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 1731 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - $185.0 vs $368.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 7900 - $1.11 vs $1.75 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700 - 211 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |