Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2143 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 110 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Renoir | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |